Sustainable Development Goals
Abstract/Objectives
Based on the research outcomes, the project team jointly drafted the policy white paper The Weight of a Thousand Mouthfuls of Water (Draft), proposing five strategic pillars for Taiwan’s watershed governance: 1. Scientific monitoring and data transparency; 2. Legal reform and enforcement; 3. Watershed co-governance and infrastructure enhancement; 4. Drinking water safety and risk management; and 5. Public engagement and education promotion. Together, these five pillars establish a systemic pathway that advances from risk recognition to cultural co-governance, marking a policy evolution from “symptom control” to “root-cause solutions.” The governance logic embodies three transformations: from reactive enforcement to preventive and institutionalized monitoring; from isolated control points to integrated watershed management; and from departmental responsibility to civic co-governance. The white paper’s foundational ideas were first presented at the April 2025 “Consultative Meeting on Upstream Drainage Interception for Drinking Water Intakes,” which led to collaborative planning among the Ministry of Environment, Water Resources Agency, and local governments on demonstration pipelines and dry–wet weather diversion systems. This outcome demonstrates that university research can move beyond data production to institutional innovation—driving governance transformation and shaping a new paradigm of civic co-governance in watershed management.
Results/Contributions

Building upon the team’s research findings, this project jointly produced the policy white paper The Weight of a Thousand Mouthfuls of Water (Draft), which proposes five strategic action pillars:


  1. Scientific Monitoring and Data Transparency
  2. Legal Reform and Implementation
  3. Watershed Co-Governance and Infrastructure Enhancement
  4. Drinking Water Safety and Risk Management
  5. Public Engagement and Education Promotion


These five pillars together form a systematic pathway for watershed governance in Taiwan, advancing from risk recognition to cultural co-governance, and shaping a policy evolution chain from “symptomatic treatment” to “root-cause solutions.”


The underlying governance logic can be summarized into three major transformations:


1. From “Symptomatic Treatment” to “Root-Cause Solutions”: Science and Regulation as the Core

In the past, environmental governance often relied on reactive enforcement and temporary responses, failing to prevent long-term pollution accumulation.

The Scientific Monitoring pillar exposes the real extent of pollution, while Legal Support integrates these findings into the regulatory framework—forming a closed loop from data to decision-making. This approach establishes a new norm of preventive monitoring and institutionalized governance.


2. From “Single Point” to “Watershed”: Integrated, Holistic Management

Traditional approaches focused on isolated discharge points or localized issues, resulting in fragmented governance between upstream and downstream areas.

The Watershed Co-Governance pillar emphasizes managing by watershed units, integrating water quantity, water quality, and ecological indicators. Through coordination between central and local authorities, third-party verification, and infrastructure improvement, this approach strengthens both environmental quality and system resilience.


3. From “Departmental” to “Societal”: Civic Co-Governance and Cultural Transformation

Environmental governance is not solely the responsibility of the government; it requires collective social participation.

The Health Protection pillar translates policy outcomes into tangible public safety guarantees, while the Public Engagement pillar promotes co-learning and cooperation through education, open data, and citizen-based monitoring. Together, they nurture a long-term culture of watershed stewardship and societal resilience.


Summary Table of the Five Strategic Pillars


Implementation Background

The core ideas of this white paper were first presented at the “Consultative Meeting on Upstream Drainage Interception for Drinking Water Intakes” in April 2025, which facilitated collaboration among the Ministry of Environment, Water Resources Agency, and local governments on developing “Dedicated Demonstration Sections” and a “Dry–Wet Weather Diversion System.”

This outcome demonstrates that university-based research can not only generate data but also drive institutional transformation, establishing a new paradigm of civic co-governance and evidence-based environmental policy.



Keywords
Watershed governanceWater quality monitoringLegal reformDrinking water safetyPublic participation
Contact Information
陳俊銘
chenjunming@gapp.nthu.edu.tw