Decision making, when humans and other animals choose between two options, is not always based on the absolute values of the options, but can also depend on their relative values. The present study examines whether decision making by cuttlefish is dependent on relative values learned from previous experience. Cuttlefish preferred a larger quantity when making a choice between one or two shrimps (1 vs. 2) during a two-alternative forced choice. However, after cuttlefish were primed under conditions where they were given a small reward for choosing one shrimp in a no shrimp vs. one shrimp test (0 vs. 1) six times in a row, they chose one shrimp significantly more frequently in the 1 vs. 2 test. This reversed preference for a smaller quantity was not due to satiation at the time of decision making, as cuttlefish fed a small shrimp six times without any choice test prior to the experiment still preferred two shrimps significantly more often in a subsequent 1 vs. 2 test. This suggests that the preference of one shrimp in the quantity comparison test occurs via a process of learned valuation. Foraging preference in cuttlefish thus depends on the relative value of previous prey choices.