The Judicialization of Party Law
Sustainable Development Goals
Abstract/Objectives
Results/Contributions
This article first explores the conceptual meaning and historical context of liberal democratic basic order in Germany, and focuses on the decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court. In particular, it analyzes the three classical cases of dissolution of political parties: prohibition of the Socialist Reich Party (SRP-Verbot) in 1952, prohibition of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD-Verbot) in 1956 and prohibition of the National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD-Verbot) in 2017. It then demonstrates common features of legal argumentation and constitutional interpretation facing liberal democratic basic order. This article also presents a comparative analysis between “liberal democratic basic order” of Germany and “free and democratic constitutional order” [自由民主之憲政秩序 (zì yóu mín zhǔ zhī xiàn zhèng zhì xù)] of Taiwan from the perspective of comparative constitutional law. It takes a closer look at the revision of the Constitution in 1992, judicial interpretations and the law of democracy in Taiwan. The author argues, however, a rereading of Karl Doehring’s lecture can realize the new value of “free and democratic constitutional order” in Taiwan.